Q: Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq? Q: But the inspectors didn't find any weapons of mass destruction. Q: And that's why we invaded Iraq? Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass destruction, did we? Q: Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction? Q: I'm confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a war, then why didn't they use any of those weapons when we went to war with them? Q: That doesn't make sense. Why would they choose to die if they had all those big weapons with which they could have fought back? Q: I don't know about you, but I don't think they had any of those weapons our government said they did. Q: And what was that? Q: Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his country? Q: Kind of like what they do in China? Q: So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain, it’s a good country, even if that country tortures people? Q: Why were people in Iraq being tortured? Q: Isn’t that exactly what happens in China? Q: What’s the difference between China and Iraq? Q: Didn’t you once tell me Communists were bad? Q: How are the Cuban Communists bad? Q: Like in Iraq? Q: And like in China, too? Q: How come Cuba isn’t a good economic competitor? Q: But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started doing business with them, wouldn’t that help the Cubans become capitalists? Q: I didn’t think I was being one. Q: Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement? Q: What’s a military coup? Q: Didn’t the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup? Q: Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate? Q: Didn’t you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate leader? Q: Why did we invade Afghanistan? Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th? Q: So how did Afghanistan figure into all that? Q: Aren’t the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people’s heads and hands? Q: Didn’t the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars back in May of 2001? Q: Fighting drugs? Q: How did they do such a good job? Q: So, when the Taliban cut off people’s heads and hands for growing flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people’s heads and hands off for other reasons? Q: Don’t they also cut off people’s hands and heads in Saudi Arabia? Q: Don’t Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too? Q: What’s the difference? Q: It sounds like the same thing with a different name. Q: But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from Saudi Arabia. Q: Who trained them? Q: Was he from Afghanistan? Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once. Q: Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan talked about? Q: So the Soviets – I mean, the Russians – are now our friends? Q: So the French and Germans are evil,too? A: Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French fries and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast. Q: Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn’t do what we want them to do? Q: But wasn’t Iraq one of our friends back in the 1980s? Q: Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then? Q: Why did that make him our friend? Q: Isn’t that when he gassed the Kurds? Q: So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our friend? Q: And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an enemy? Q: Why? Q: I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right? Q: But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq? Q: So basically, what you’re saying is that we attacked Iraq because George W. Bush hears voices in his head? Q: Good night, Daddy. |
Contact Congress
Toll Free Numbers To The Washington Switchboard
1-866 338-1015
1-866 220-0044
1-866 220-0044
Saturday, July 12, 2008
SunHerald.com
Brilliant!!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?"
ReplyDeleteThey, the Taliban government, harbored Osama bin Laden, and refused to turn him over to us. Plus, as a poke in the eye to us, they named him the commander in chief of their armed forces.
"Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.
A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan back in the 1980s."
False. He was financed by the Saudis. We funneled our support of the mujahadeen through Pakistani intelligence. Osama got no such help from us.
"Q: Didn’t the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars back in May of 2001?"
No. False again. This lie was made up by columnist Robert Scheer:
http://www.spinsanity.org/posts/200106-3.html#12a
http://www.spinsanity.org/post.html?2003_02_23_archive.html
http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/this_just_in/documents/01839506.htm
Anonymous wrote:
ReplyDelete> Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "SunHerald.com":
>
> "Q: What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?"
>
> They, the Taliban government, harbored Osama bin Laden, and refused to turn him over to us. Plus, as a poke in the eye to us, they named him the commander in chief of their armed forces.
> They also offered to give him up to a third country where he could have a fair trial. We would have thrown him in guantanamo without a hearing for years and, no doubt, tortured him..or it's all just bull crap and he was working with us on it all and was our guy AGAIN ( "The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment at an American Hospital last July in Dubai") and we decided to just let him go and we invaded Afghanistan for the Pan Asian pipeline that Unocal wanted so badly they were willing to take our tax dollars and shovel them to the mujahadeen to fight a proxy war for them. The Taliban agreed to allow the Pan Asian pipeline and then renegged. That is why we invaded Afghanistan instead of Saudi Arabia.
> "Q: I seem to recall he was our friend once.
> A: Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan back in the 1980s."
yes, when he was our terrorist. just like Hussein was our terrorist at one time.
>
> False. He was financed by the Saudis. We funneled our support of the mujahadeen through Pakistani intelligence. Osama got no such help from us.
Yes he did. We paid for all the weapons he trained the mujahadeen to use. The Saudis helped to but that was our war and the mujahadeen were paid for by us.
>
> "Q: Didn’t the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars back in May of 2001?"
>
> No. False again. This lie was made up by columnist Robert Scheer:'
Robert Sheer doesn't know how to lie. you can call it aid you can call it a gift but the Taliban made out on the deal.
"Clearly, the aid was partially motivated by the Taliban’s drug crackdown, and it helped the Taliban indirectly. But it also helped to feed thousands of starving people in the midst of a multi-year drought."
http://www.spinsanity.org/post.html?2001_10_07_archive.html#6253560
>
> http://www.spinsanity.org/posts/200106-3.html#12a
>
> http://www.spinsanity.org/post.html?2003_02_23_archive.html
your bostonphoenix link is broken.
>
> http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/this_just_in/documents/01839506.htm
"Yes he did. We paid for all the weapons he trained the mujahadeen to use. The Saudis helped to but that was our war and the mujahadeen were paid for by us."
ReplyDeleteOsama was not mujahadeen. He helped the mujahadeen: he was a financer and organizer. He wasnt a fighter. We did not pay for the weapons he trained the muj to use. He and the Saudis paid for that.
"Robert Sheer doesn't know how to lie."
Okay, then he knows how to make mistakes.
"you can call it aid you can call it a gift but the Taliban made out on the deal."
I call it neither a gift or aid. It was to help the people of Afghanistan. Not their government.